java ean 128

java barcode ean 128

java gs1 128

java gs1 128

java gs1-128

java barcode ean 128,

java gs1-128,

java gs1 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java gs1-128,
java barcode ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java barcode ean 128,
java ean 128,
java ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1-128,
java ean 128,
java ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,

java gs1-128,
java ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java ean 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java gs1 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1-128,
java gs1-128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java barcode ean 128,
java ean 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1 128,
java gs1 128,
java ean 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1-128,
java ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java ean 128,
java gs1 128,
java barcode ean 128,
java barcode ean 128,

The heart of an ASP.NET MVC application is the controller, and testing the results and effectiveness of controller actions is the primary goal of unit testing. Testing controller actions means testing the response generated for a given input, but also it means isolating the controller logic from dependencies such as the service layer, data repositories, the file system, and especially the ASP.NET HTTP context.

This still allows for incremental deployment. You provide failover capabilities or can manually switch over a datacenter.

Each datacenter needs the following namespaces, depending on your client connectivity capabilities:

Outlook Web App/OA/EWS/EAS namespace POP3/IMAP4 namespace RPC Client Access namespace SMTP namespace

Testing, however, doesn t end with the controller actions and routes that we examined earlier in this chapter and in 8. Let s then review a few other, more specific aspects of an ASP.NET MVC application that you want to test.

To start planning your namespace, you need to consider the various locations of clients and servers and the physical connections they have to the Exchange servers. Typically the namespaces align with your DNS configuration. You can choose from the following namespace-planning options:

Consolidated data center Single namespace with proxy sites Single namespace with multiple sites Regional namespaces Multiple forests

(continued)

This namespace scenario is the simplest one and includes a single namespace to access a single physical site where all the Exchange servers are hosted. The Contoso scenario described in 2 of this book is an example of a consolidated data center. This scenario has the following advantages:

In ASP.NET MVC, a view is usually humble and passive, and often it doesn t require any automated test. However, if you have custom HTML helpers that is, custom extension methods you use to render HTML into a view you might want to consider writing a few unit tests to ensure they produce the markup you expect. Making assertions for an HTML helper method is not a task that requires a lot of imagination. There are not too many ways to make it other than asserting that the response you get matches a given fixed HTML string. Let s briefly examine one of the Microsoft unit tests for one of the standard HTML helpers the CheckBox helper:

Only one or very few DNS records need to be managed. Only one or very few certificates are required for your Exchange organization. All users use the same URL to access the Exchange server.

This namespace scenario is configured by providing Internet access to the Client Access server by opening the relevant ports by a firewall or implementing an application layer firewall such as Forefront Threat Management Gateway in the perimeter network. If you want to provide POP3/IMAP4, you need also to consider how the clients will send their messages using SMTP. To overcome this easily, you can configure the Hub Transport role on each Client Access server. Otherwise, you need to plan separately for message sending and message receiving namespaces.

[TestMethod] public void CheckBox_With_Only_Name() { // Arrange HtmlHelper helper = HtmlHelperTest.GetHtmlHelper(); // Act MvcHtmlString html = helper.CheckBox("foo"); // Assert Assert.AreEqual(@"<input checked=""checked"" id=""foo"" name=""foo"" " + @"type=""checkbox"" value=""true"" />" + @"<input name=""foo"" type=""hidden"" value=""false"" />", html.ToHtmlString()); }

This model is based on the consolidated datacenter model but proxies the requests to the physical Mailbox server located at another site. One of the sites has one or more Internet-facing Client Access servers that proxy the requests. This scenario has the following advantages:

Only one or very few DNS records need to be managed. Only one or very few certificates are required for your Exchange organization All users use the same URL to access Exchange server.

The disadvantage of this model is that most users will access their mailboxes using proxying, thus accessing their data might be slower across latent WAN links. To configure this namespace model, you need to configure the ExternalURL option of the Client Access server(s) at one site, and make sure that the ExternalURL settings on all the other